Table of Contents
# 7 Profound Lessons from "As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl"
The harrowing true story of David Reimer, known to the world through John Colapinto's book "As Nature Made Him," is more than just a tragic anecdote. It's a pivotal case study that reshaped our understanding of gender identity, the power of biological imperatives, and the ethics of medical intervention. Born Bruce Reimer, a botched circumcision led to a radical decision by his parents, guided by psychologist Dr. John Money, to surgically reassign him as a girl and raise him as "Brenda." This experiment, intended to prove that gender was entirely a product of nurture, ultimately ended in devastating personal tragedy and profound scientific re-evaluation.
This article delves into the critical lessons gleaned from David Reimer's life, comparing the flawed approaches of the past with contemporary understandings, highlighting the pros and cons of each perspective, and offering unique insights into the enduring nature vs. nurture debate.
---
1. The Perilous Pitfalls of the Pure Nurture Approach to Gender Identity
**Initial Approach (Mid-20th Century):** Dr. John Money's influential theory posited that gender identity was largely plastic and could be shaped entirely by rearing, especially if interventions occurred before a child reached 18 months. He believed that if a child was assigned a gender, surgically altered, and raised consistently, they would adopt that identity regardless of their chromosomal or gonadal sex. This offered a seemingly straightforward "solution" for infants born with ambiguous genitalia or, in Bruce's case, accidental damage.
**Pros (Perceived then):** Provided a clear protocol for medical professionals faced with complex intersex conditions or accidental genital injury, aiming to "normalize" the child's life within a binary gender framework. It aligned with behaviorist psychology prevalent at the time, which emphasized environmental conditioning.
**Cons (Revealed by Reimer's Case):** Grossly underestimated the profound biological underpinnings of gender identity, including genetic, hormonal, and neurological factors. It led to invasive and irreversible interventions based on flawed premises, causing immense psychological trauma and identity confusion when an individual's innate sense of self conflicted with their assigned gender. David Reimer's persistent "boyish" behaviors and discomfort with his female identity, despite rigorous conditioning, starkly demonstrated the limits of nurture.
---
2. Affirming the Biological Imperative: Nature's Unyielding Role
**Shifting Understanding (Post-Reimer):** David Reimer's story became a powerful testament to the biological basis of gender identity. Despite being raised as Brenda, receiving estrogen therapy, and undergoing genital surgery, his internal sense of self remained male. This experience, alongside accumulating research in neuroscience and endocrinology, solidified the view that while social factors play a role, there is a strong, innate component to gender identity that is deeply rooted in brain development and prenatal hormonal exposure.
**Pros of This Perspective:** Leads to more respectful and less invasive approaches for individuals with variations in sex development (VSDs/intersex conditions). It prioritizes understanding and affirming an individual's self-identified gender rather than imposing one. This perspective recognizes the complexity of human identity, moving beyond a purely social construct.
**Cons (Historical Misconceptions):** In the past, an overemphasis on social constructs sometimes led to resistance against acknowledging biological factors, fearing it would limit personal freedom or reinforce gender stereotypes. However, the modern understanding embraces biological influences without diminishing the spectrum of human experience.
---
3. Ethical Evolution in Medical Intervention for Sex and Gender
**Past Medical Ethics (Money's Era):** Decisions regarding gender assignment and irreversible surgeries for infants were often made paternalistically by doctors, without the child's future consent or full consideration of long-term psychological impacts. The priority was often surgical "normalization" to fit societal expectations of binary sex, rather than the child's psychological well-being or autonomy.
**Modern Ethical Standards:** Emphasize informed consent, delaying irreversible procedures until individuals are old enough to participate in decision-making, and prioritizing the individual's psychological health and self-determination. For intersex individuals, the focus has shifted towards supporting families and providing psychological care, while allowing the individual to determine their own gender identity and make choices about their bodies later in life.
**Pros of Modern Approach:** Respects bodily autonomy, minimizes iatrogenic (medically induced) harm, and fosters trust between patients and medical professionals. It allows individuals to develop their identity authentically.
**Cons of Past Approach:** Led to significant psychological trauma, identity crises, and a deep sense of betrayal for many, like David Reimer, who discovered their true history later in life.
---
4. The Critical Role of Transparency vs. Deception in Identity Formation
**The Reimer Approach:** David's parents, on Dr. Money's advice, concealed his true biological history from him. He was raised believing he was born female and developed complications. This secrecy was maintained for years, intended to allow Brenda to integrate fully into her assigned female role without confusion.
**The Harm of Deception:** When David eventually learned the truth about his past, the revelation was profoundly destabilizing. It led to a deep sense of betrayal, confusion, and further exacerbated his identity crisis, contributing to severe psychological distress. The lack of transparency prevented him from integrating his personal history and understanding his own experiences.
**Recommended Modern Practice:** Openly discussing medical history and decisions with children as they grow, in an age-appropriate manner, is crucial. While difficult conversations, honesty fosters trust, allows individuals to understand their own bodies and histories, and empowers them to make informed decisions about their future.
---
5. The Enduring Power of Identity: Beyond Social Conditioning
**The Misconception:** The Reimer case initially sought to prove that intensive social conditioning could override biological predispositions, creating a female identity in a biologically male individual. The belief was that consistent reinforcement of gender roles and expectations would shape identity.
**The Reality:** David Reimer's life demonstrated the profound resilience of an individual's innate sense of self. Despite being dressed in girls' clothes, playing with dolls, and being told he was a girl, David gravitated towards masculine play, rejected feminine roles, and consistently felt "different" and fundamentally male. His journey to reclaim his male identity as David was a testament to the idea that identity is not merely an external construct but an internal truth.
**Insight:** This highlights that while societal norms and upbringing undeniably influence gender expression, they cannot fundamentally alter a deeply ingrained gender identity. Ignoring this innate core can lead to significant psychological distress and a lifelong struggle for authenticity.
---
6. The Long-Term Psychological Cost of Imposed Identity
**The Hope (from Money's perspective):** That Bruce/Brenda would live a normal, happy life as a girl, unaware of his original sex, with the "experiment" being a resounding success.
**The Devastating Reality:** David Reimer's life was marked by severe depression, anxiety, relentless bullying, identity confusion, and ultimately, a series of personal tragedies including the suicide of his brother and, later, his own. He struggled to form lasting relationships and found it difficult to reconcile his past with his present. His story stands as a stark warning about the profound and long-lasting psychological damage that can result from attempts to force an individual into an identity that conflicts with their innate sense of self.
**Comparison:** This contrasts sharply with approaches that support a child's self-identified gender, which are associated with better mental health outcomes and overall well-being. The costs of imposing an identity are far greater than the perceived benefits of "fixing" a perceived problem.
---
7. The Evolving and Inclusive Understanding of Gender and Sex
**Outdated View (Mid-20th Century):** Gender was strictly binary, determined solely by external genitalia at birth, and considered interchangeable with biological sex. Any deviation or ambiguity was seen as a medical problem requiring "correction." Gender identity was seen as a simple function of rearing.
**Contemporary Understanding:** Sex and gender are recognized as complex and multifaceted. Biological sex encompasses chromosomes, gonads, hormones, and internal/external anatomy, with natural variations (intersex). Gender identity is understood as an individual's internal sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else on the spectrum, and is distinct from biological sex. Gender expression is how an individual outwardly presents their gender. This nuanced view acknowledges diversity and self-determination.
**Pros of the Contemporary View:** It is more inclusive, affirming, and aligns with the lived experiences of a vast array of individuals. It promotes compassion and understanding, moving away from pathologizing natural variations or internal identities.
**Cons of the Outdated View:** It was restrictive, caused immense suffering for individuals who did not fit neatly into its categories, and led to harmful medical practices based on a limited understanding of human biology and psychology.
---
Conclusion
David Reimer's life, as chronicled in "As Nature Made Him," offers a profoundly important and tragic lesson for humanity. It underscored the formidable interplay of nature and nurture in shaping identity, exposing the dangers of oversimplifying complex biological and psychological realities. His story catalyzed a radical shift in medical ethics regarding intersex conditions and gender identity, moving from paternalistic intervention to patient-centered care, emphasizing informed consent, transparency, and respect for individual autonomy.
Ultimately, David Reimer's struggle reminds us of the critical importance of listening to and affirming an individual's innate sense of self. His life, though tragically cut short, left an enduring legacy that continues to shape our understanding of what it means to be human, and how best to support individuals in their journey of self-discovery and authenticity.
